Chaining exceptions

[BCS]

Hello Chris Nicholson-Sauls,

> BCS wrote:
> 
>> That stands to reason because in some cases (when things go
>> correctly) there isn't one.
>> 
> One hopes.  Just the same: (hypothetical syntax incoming)
> 
> try {
> // ...
> }
> catch ( ExceptionA exa ) {
> // ...
> }
> catch ( ExceptionB exb ) {
> // ...
> }
> finally ( x ) {
> // ...
> if ( x ) throw new ExceptionC( x );
> }
> And obviously if finally has no () it doesn't bother with the feature.
> 

IIRC the .NET CLI has some of what you want:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/533968/c-finally-block-that-only-runs-on-exceptions