Should operator overload methods be virtual?

[retard]

Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:16:33 -0500, bearophile wrote:

> dsimcha:
>> but it would introduce an
>> inconsistency into the language relative to "regular" methods.
> 
> Right, it's an exception to a rule of the language, so it increases the
> language complexity.

I guess the systems programming language users more often think that 
'more executable bloat when compiled with the currently available 
practical real world tools, the more complex the language in practical 
real world use'. So if there's some tiny little feature that saves you 
1-2 cpu cycles in practical real world systems programming applications 
or makes building a practical real world non-academic commercial compiler 
a bit easier and thus provides more practical value to the paying 
customer, the language should include that feature.