Should pure nothrow ---> @pure @nothrow ?

[retard]

Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:10:34 +0100, Danny Wilson wrote:

> Op Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:58:59 +0100 schreef Don <nospam at nospam.com>:
> 
>>> void foo()
>>> @naked body
>>> {
>>
>> LOL! Spam filters would love that!!
> 
> I can already imagine the jokes spreading over the internets:
> 
> @safe public double penetration(of a) @naked body { ... }

Nice work, now you don't need to imagine it anymore.