Should certain abstract classes be instantiable?
jarrett.billingsley at gmail.com
Fri Oct 2 07:18:37 PDT 2009
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
<SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:
>> But.. you mark something abstract when you want it to be .. abstract.
>> How would you argue that abstract is basically a no-op when used on
>> methods with bodies?
> It's not a no-op. Try it.
Yeah, not *currently*, but isn't that what you're proposing?
More information about the Digitalmars-d