dmd support for IDEs

[Lutger]

Walter Bright wrote:

...
> 
> Think of what it provides as very similar to what ddoc does, except that
> instead of being in a human-readable format it would be a
> machine-readable one.
> 
> In other words, for each module you'll be able to get
> 
> . all the symbols in that module, and the members of those symbols
> (recursively)
> . the file/line of the source location of each symbol
> . the ddoc comment for each symbol
> . the type of each symbol
> 
> Things could be added over time, I was just thinking of this for starters.

What about file/line/column of the symbol? Is this much work / hard work to 
add?