LRU cache for ~=

[Denis Koroskin]

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:00:57 +0400, Rainer Deyke <rainerd at eldwood.com>  
wrote:

> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> One surprising (but safe) behavior that remains with slices is this:
>>
>> void fun(int[] a) {
>>    a[0] = 0;
>>    a ~= 42;
>>    a[0] = 42;
>> }
>>
>> The caller may or may not see 42 in the first slot after the call.
>
> Your definition of "safe" is clearly not aligned with mine.
>
>

Safe as in SafeD (i.e. no memory corruption) :)