LRU cache for ~=

[Brad Roberts]

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Walter Bright wrote:

> Denis Koroskin wrote:
> > Safe as in SafeD (i.e. no memory corruption) :)
> 
> Right. The problems with other definitions of safe is they are too
> ill-defined.

There's SafeD, which has a fairly formal definition.

The other side of it is the general principle of D which is that the right 
way should be the easy and obvious way.  Slices and arrays have issue with 
the principle.