Eliminate "new" for class object creation?

[Kagamin]

Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:

> I'm having a hard time justifying that you use
> 
> new X(args)
> 
> to create a class object, and
> 
> X(args)
> 
> to create a struct object. I wrote this:
> 
> ============
> The syntactic  difference between  the expression creating  a @struct@
> object---Test(@\meta{args}@)@---and the  expression creating a @class@
> object---\cc{new Test(}\meta{args}@)@---may be  jarring at first. \dee
> could have dropped the @new@  keyword entirely, but that @new@ reminds
> the programmer that an object allocation (i.e., nontrivial work) takes
> place.
> ===============

That's struct literal, not struct object. Struct object is on the left hand side. Struct literal calling the constructor looks more like a hack, C++ looks more consistent in this aspect. And you can create a struct object with new operator.