Targeting C

[Leandro Lucarella]

Andrei Alexandrescu, el 23 de octubre a las 13:06 me escribiste:
> Pelle Månsson wrote:
> >bearophile wrote:
> >>Yigal Chripun:
> >>
> >>>Hell no. This is why I hate certain programming languages.
> >>>if you are trying to obfuscate the language than why not just define:
> >>>rtqfrdsg and fdkjtkf as the function names?
> >>
> >>Don't be silly. In my dlibs "xsomething" are the lazy functions,
> >>and "something" are the strict ones. That's not obfuscated, you
> >>need seconds to learn a single easy rule.
> >>
> >>Bye,
> >>bearophile
> >I think the complaint was not as much about the x as the iota.
> >Seriously, iota?
> >
> >However, I like the array(range(0,10)) where range is always lazy,
> >and array forces eagerness, better than separate xrange and range
> >functions.
> 
> Orthogonality for the win.

Sometimes "practicality beats purity" :)

But I don't really care that much about this one...

-- 
Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca)                     http://llucax.com.ar/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145  104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DIEZ "PUNGAS" MENOS
	-- Crónica TV