No header files?

[Yigal Chripun]

On 23/10/2009 21:52, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:50:18 -0400, Walter Bright
> <newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>
>> Yigal Chripun wrote:
>>>> Shared libraries are inherently not portable from system to system.
>>> only if you consider dlls and so. Java jars are portable. so do .net
>>> assemblies.
>>
>> Jars and .nets are not executable code. Dlls and shared libraries are.
>
> .net assemblies built by visual studio are packaged as dlls. Although I
> don't know exactly how they are executed, I'm sure it's some sort of
> bytecode.
>
> Just saying...
>
> -Steve

http://www.programmersheaven.com/2/FAQ-DOTNET-DOTNET-Assembly-Explained