[OT] What should be in a programming language?
Yigal Chripun
yigal100 at gmail.com
Sun Oct 25 14:35:50 PDT 2009
On 25/10/2009 08:47, bearophile wrote:
> Yigal Chripun:
>> there should be no syntactic difference between an int and a user
>> defined type.
>> for example I should be able to do:
>> struct foo : int {}
>
> With "alias this" D2 is able to do something like that, but it uses a nonstandard syntax... So here things may be improved in D2.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
This is one aspect that D inherited from C which I really dislike.
adding alias this to the mix is adding a sin to a crime (as the Hebrew
saying goes).
Scala shows how this can be properly designed.
D has many (sometimes very powerful) hacks that could and should be
replaced with a much better general solution.
for instance there's special handling of void return types so it would
be easier to work with in generic code. instead of this compiler hack a
much simpler solution is to have a unit type and ditch C style void. the
bottom type should also exist mainly for completeness and for a few
stdlib functions like abort() and exit()
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list