[OT] What should be in a programming language?
Kagamin
spam at here.lot
Mon Oct 26 05:47:10 PDT 2009
Yigal Chripun Wrote:
> for instance there's special handling of void return types so it would
> be easier to work with in generic code. instead of this compiler hack a
> much simpler solution is to have a unit type and ditch C style void. the
> bottom type should also exist mainly for completeness and for a few
> stdlib functions like abort() and exit()
uint and void return types may be nearly equivalent for x86 architecture, CLI makes strong difference between them.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list