D naming style?

[Christopher Wright]

Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Ali Cehreli<acehreli at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Thank you!
>>
>> Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
>>> Many people don't indicate class members with any kind of decoration
>> I noticed that too. :)
>>
>> The justification that I've come up with is that, we need the decoration in e.g. C++, because the member declaration is not visible in the implementation file, so the decoration communicates that the member is in the header file.
>>
>> That's not the case in D, so there is no need for the decoration; but I miss them too. :)
> 
> I'm consistently confused by D (and Java and C#) code that doesn't
> indicate member names, especially when they're named really common
> things that often conflict with local variables, like "len" or "src"
> or such. Unless the type is small enough to fit on a single screen,
> it's easy to forget the member names.

Most of the code I write uses classes that fit in one screen (20 lines 
or so) and still prefixes private fields with an underscore. It's 
convenient when initializing fields from constructor parameters.