Template Metaprogramming Made Easy (Huh?)

[Lutger]

language_fan wrote:

(...)
> 
> For what's it worth, I have not seen any firmware projects that use D,
> either. Not that it's impossible, no one in the firmware industry just is
> not interested in D. When you have limited amount of memory resources,
> the bloaty executables that dmd generates (all firmware uses x86 opcodes,
> right), the typeinfos, and the garbage collector are a nuisance.
> 

If you don't mind me asking, what is your interest in D?