Template Metaprogramming Made Easy (Huh?)

[Rainer Deyke]

language_fan wrote:
> The members of the last group have studied computer science and 
> languages, in particular. They have found a pet academic language, 
> typically a pure one, but paradigms may differ. In fact this is the group 
> which uses something other than the hybrid object-oriented/procedural 
> model. They appreciate a strong, orthogonal core language that scales 
> cleanly. They are not scared of esoteric non-C-like syntax. They use 
> languages that are not ready to take a step to the "real world" during 
> the 70 next years.

Of the three types, this comes closest to describing me.  Yet, I am
completely self-taught, and my preferred language is still C++.  (I
wouldn't call it my pet language.  I loathe C++, I just haven't found a
suitable replacement yet.)

Stereotypes are dangerous.


-- 
Rainer Deyke - rainerd at eldwood.com