putting more smarts into a == b

Andrei Alexandrescu SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Sat Sep 26 18:32:13 PDT 2009


Consider two objects a and b with a of class type. Currently, the 
expression a == b is blindly rewritten as a.opEquals(b). I argue it 
should be rewritten into a call to an (imaginary/inlined) function 
equalObjects(a, b), with the following definition:

bool equalObjects(T, U)(T a, U b) if (is(T == class))
{
     static if (is(U == class))
     {
         if (b is null) return a is null;
         if (a is null) return b is null;
     }
     else
     {
         enforce(a !is null);
     }
     return a.opEquals(b);
}

This hoists the identity test outside the opEquals call and also deals 
with null references. What do you think?


Andrei



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list