OpEquals and Interfaces

Kagamin spam at here.lot
Tue Apr 13 15:14:55 PDT 2010


Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:

> Any good reason? No.
> 
> But the stated reason is usually that interfaces don't necessarily have to  
> be Objects, they can be COM objects, which 1) has no bearing in some OSes,  
> and 2) does anyone use this feature?

Which feature? Interfaces? COM? upcasting? or opEquals?
I don't use opEquals. :3



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list