OpEquals and Interfaces

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:14:55 -0400, Kagamin <spam at here.lot> wrote:

> Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
>
>> Any good reason? No.
>>
>> But the stated reason is usually that interfaces don't necessarily have  
>> to
>> be Objects, they can be COM objects, which 1) has no bearing in some  
>> OSes,
>> and 2) does anyone use this feature?
>
> Which feature? Interfaces? COM? upcasting? or opEquals?
> I don't use opEquals. :3

COM via D interfaces.

-Steve