Patches, bottlenecks, OpenSource
bearophile
bearophileHUGS at lycos.com
Thu Apr 15 12:41:20 PDT 2010
Don:
>And really, D doesn't need many people working on the DMD compiler.<
I agree, it's like having many people working around a dead corpse trying to revive it. Better use the time to adopt gcc and llvm back-ends at their best, keeping in mind, while designing D, that there are features that those back-ends have and the dmd back-end doesn't have that it will be good to add to the language. Simple example: refusing computed gotos because they are a lot of work to implement is not a justification that holds if both gcc and llvm already implement them and allow the front-end to just use them in a simple enough way.
Bye,
bearophile
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list