Changeset 442, implicit Vs explicit

[bearophile]

Walter Bright:
> No, it also exists in the C runtime.

OK, the same array is specified three times.


> D is full of syntax, at some point adding more and more syntax to deal with more 
> and more obscure cases is not a net improvement. There's a point of diminishing 
> returns.

OK. I have updated the bug report:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3849

Bye and thank you for your answers,
bearophile