Changeset 442, implicit Vs explicit

[Michel Fortin]

On 2010-04-27 11:50:55 -0400, bearophile <bearophileHUGS at lycos.com> said:

> My opinion is that it's bug-safer something like:
> 
> @implicit_filling immutable ubyte _ctype2[256] = [/*128 items here*/];

Ouch! I agree with the idea, but can't you find a better syntax? What 
about this:

	immutable ubyte a[256] = [1,2,3,4...]; // rest of array is padded with 4s.
	immutable ubyte b[256] = [1,2,3,4]; // error: not enough values

-- 
Michel Fortin
michel.fortin at michelf.com
http://michelf.com/