Documentation generation

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Friday 06 August 2010 20:06:59 Bernard Helyer wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 13:22:53 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
> > 1. Being a defined part of D means it's ALWAYS there. That means there
> > won't be D compilers without ddoc.
> 
> /me waves.
> 
> I'm writing a D compiler, and have zero plans to add DDoc support. I
> couldn't do it well enough for me to waste my time on it.

Well, that's your choice, but then you haven't followed the D spec in that 
regard, so your compiler wouldn't be properly standard D. It is the sort of 
thing that I would expect to be somewhat lower in priority than other features 
though.

- Jonathan M Davis