Is there a report for performance compared with popular languarge?

Pelle pelle.mansson at gmail.com
Thu Aug 12 02:50:58 PDT 2010


On 08/12/2010 05:26 AM, cglee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have used 'C' and 'jav'a for several years.
> When I need speed, I used 'C'.
> When I have to reduce implemetation time, I used 'java'.
> In my view, D language has both merits from 'C' and 'java'.
> It means that it is OOP, but it generates native binary
> without VM. We already have C++ as this. But C++ makes me
> more confused when I use it.
>
> Now, I have questions about how much 'D' is fast comparing with 'java'
> and how much bigger in binary size generated by 'D' comparing with
> 'C'.  Is there anyone has information about this?.
>
> Thanks
> cglee

Last I looked, java is faster than D in some cases, and vice versa.

D will blow up the size of executables by quite a lot, though. Due to 
templates and static linking of libraries, mostly.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list