Is there a report for performance compared with popular languarge?

[Nick Sabalausky]

"cglee" <high_volt at hanmail.net> wrote in message 
news:i3vpkj$1mi3$1 at digitalmars.com...
> Hi,
>
> I have used 'C' and 'jav'a for several years.
> When I need speed, I used 'C'.
> When I have to reduce implemetation time, I used 'java'.
> In my view, D language has both merits from 'C' and 'java'.
> It means that it is OOP, but it generates native binary
> without VM. We already have C++ as this. But C++ makes me
> more confused when I use it.
>
> Now, I have questions about how much 'D' is fast comparing with 'java'
> and how much bigger in binary size generated by 'D' comparing with
> 'C'.  Is there anyone has information about this?.
>

http://dotnot.org/blog/archives/2008/03/10/xml-benchmarks-updated-graphs-with-rapidxml/

http://dotnot.org/blog/archives/2008/03/10/xml-benchmarks-parsequerymutateserialize/

http://dotnot.org/blog/archives/2008/03/12/why-is-dtango-so-fast-at-parsing-xml/