Andrei's Google Talk

[retard]

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:10:12 -0400, lurker wrote:

> Johannes Pfau Wrote:
> 
>> On 16.08.2010 22:36, lurker wrote:
>> > 
>> > This is unbelievable douchebaggery. The default ddoc IS good enough
>> > for most of us. There is simply no need for more complex tools. I
>> > think ddoc hits the sweet spot here by providing semi-professional
>> > looking html documents. Like someone said earlier, you can always
>> > spent a week worth of time creating a better tool for document
>> > generation.
>> > 
>> > Doxygen STILL doesn't support D. What does this tell? It tells that
>> > C++ is crappy for software development. The millions of C++ users
>> > haven't been able to write a docgen support for D. It's just not
>> > possible. OTOH a qualified compiler veteran such as Walter wrote a
>> > better tool in less than a week, blindfolded.
>> 
>> What's the point of this post?
>> I never wanted to replace ddoc in any way - the syntax is the best
>> documentation syntax that I've seen, the WYSIWYG ideology is great and
>> it's great that ddoc can output to different formats. If it sounded
>> like I was flaming or something, I did not want to. (I agree, the last
>> point about <,> is quite hypothetical)
> 
> Whatever. I feel insulted. :-(

And they try to convince themselves that I'm the troll..