On C/C++ undefined behaviours

[Walter Bright]

Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> Of course, I'm not saying that using source as IL is universially, 
> undeniably, better period, no matter what, or anything like that. I agree 
> that binary IL has some nice aspects. I'm just not convinced that it's as 
> much of an improvement over source-as-IL as it would initially seem.

If the "source code" consists of tokenized source code, I think it would compare 
very favorably with byte code in terms of size.