safeD formal semantics

Andrei Alexandrescu SeeWebsiteForEmail at
Sun Aug 22 13:59:45 PDT 2010

On 08/22/2010 09:26 AM, BCS wrote:
> Looking at this:
>> Prediction 4: Formal Semantics Will Be Constructed Earlier
> How much of safeD is formalizable? Is there anything in it that is
> hoplessly impractical to create formal semantics for?

I think it should be formalizable. The proofs would be very long for the 
whole thing, but a representative subset should be fine.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list