why a part of D community do not want go to D2 ?

[so]

> D1 may be "quite stable", but that's very different from "finished".
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/When_will_D1_be_finished_89749.html
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=677

What is a "finished" language, is it something like "that is it guys, we  
can't advance any further in ###"?

> The point is that D1 should have been finished ages ago.  Development of  
> D2 has detracted from this, and so people are fighting against this by  
> not supporting the D2 project.

I believe their reasons are political.
If their reason is really D1 being not finished then we are better off  
with them.
"Quite stable" and "stable" is the state we should be after, am i wrong?

Thank you.

-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/