Please vote on std.datetime

[dolive]

Bernard Helyer Wrote:

> I vote yes.
> 
> Why? Because Phobos has needed a solid module for working with dates and 
> time for a long time, and neither std.date or std.gregorian filled that 
> need -- std.date is buggy beyond repair, and std.gregorian's API doesn't 
> make my normal tasks easy. std.datetime's API is fairly intuitive, and 
> what I would expect out of a fairly modern date/time library. There are 
> some bugs over here the need attending to, but I believe that the API 
> itself is solid, and well designed, and that it can be a solid, good 
> quality module in Phobos. 

I vote yes. too