Why Ruby?
Jacob Carlborg
doob at me.com
Mon Dec 13 10:07:42 PST 2010
On 2010-12-12 18:03, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> foobar wrote:
>> D basically re-writes foreach with opApply into the ruby version
> which is why Ruby is *BETTER*
>
> You missed the point: there is no "Ruby version". They are the
> same thing.
>
>> foreach to me is a redundant obfuscation
>
> How can it be redundant? It's got the same elements the same
> number of times.
>
>
> rofl.copter.each |lol|
> spam
> end
>
>
> foreach(lol; rofl.copter)
> spam
>
>
> Same elements, just reordered.
>
>
> I don't know about the each() method itself. I've never written
> one, but I suspect it is virtually identical to opApply too.
It's pretty similar. Say I reimplement the "each" method of the Array
class then it could look like this:
class Array
def each
i = 0
while i < length
yield self[i]
i += 1
end
end
end
"yield" will call the block that is passed to the method call.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list