Purity

[Lars T. Kyllingstad]

On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:55:18 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:

> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:53:15 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
> <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> -Steve
>>
>> P.
> 
> Damn, accidentally hit shift-enter which sent the message.
> 
> Meant to write:
> 
> P.S. is there a better adjective for 'immutable or implicitly
> convertable to immutable'?  That's a lot of verbiage for something
> that's really needed in a lot of places in the spec.

Value type?

That is, a real value type, not one that is really a reference in 
disguise.  "Pure value type", perhaps?

-Lars