Why Ruby?
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Sat Dec 18 15:01:26 PST 2010
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> Any problem with the other Scala/C#-style one?:
>
> (x, y) => x * y
>
> // Lowered to:
>
> (x, y) { return x * y; }
>
> (Maybe that was rejected before due the the weird float operators that are
> now being ditched?)
The problem with the (x,y) parameter lists, where x and y are the parameters, is
that it is ambiguous with the existing syntax of (x,y) where x and y are types
and the parameters are omitted.
For example:
void foo(int);
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list