Why Ruby?
Simen kjaeraas
simen.kjaras at gmail.com
Sat Dec 18 15:13:57 PST 2010
Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> foo(x, y => x * y);
>
> The problem with all these is what is the difference between:
>
> { x * y }
> { x * y; } <== note the ;
> { return x * y; }
The problem of D's lambda syntax is it is optimized for longer
functions. Usually, the delegates I write are one line long. I cannot
see that this syntax collides with anything at the moment, but feel free
to enlighten me:
{ => 4; }
{ a => 2*a; }
{ a, b => a>b; }
{ => @ + @; } // turns into { a, b => a + b; }
--
Simen
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list