Why Ruby?
Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com
Sat Dec 18 17:27:13 PST 2010
On 12/19/10, Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> Yes, because in practice "a>b" must end up being evaluated in the wrong
>> scope. I've used std.algorithm very little so far, and yet I've still
>> found
>> that limitation to be a problem.
>
> ..and if you're going beyond that,
> there's
> the fuller, complete syntax.
>
Exactly. Inventing a whole new syntax or borrowing some kind of
functional-language style syntax would only alienate those already
familiar with C syntax.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list