Why Ruby?

[so]

> That syntax can't even differ "a > b" from "b > a", and @ is ugly to be  
> used frequently.
> On the other hand strings open many doors probably limited by only our  
> imagination.
> And it is there in the language spec, enabled by tiny template feature,  
> passing strings as arguments.

I was wrong saying it can't differ. Didn't see the number after @.
Still you are limited comparing to string version and requires a language  
feature. (which is unnecessarily, well for me!)

-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/