What's the problem in opensourcing htod?

[Andrej Mitrovic]

"It's probably wouldn't".

I need a new brand of coffee. -_-

On 12/21/10, Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is htod a part of the C++ DM toolkit? I don't think it is, I mean it's
> only useful for the D language. Sooner or later Walter is either going
> to open-source it or we'll be forced to reinvent the tool. It's
> probably wouldn't be much work for a C-only header translator.
>
> On 12/21/10, Mariusz Gliwiński <alienballance at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dnia wtorek 21 grudzień 2010 o 23:08:34 Jonathan M Davis napisał(a):
>>> On Tuesday, December 21, 2010 13:58:02 Mariusz Gliwiński wrote:
>>> > Hello,
>>> > Why don't You make htod opensource? I don't think it has commercial
>>> > potential, or I'm wrong? I'm asking, because it's a shame that people
>>> > who
>>> > wants publish D bindings have to make their own scripts for that (so
>>> > bindings can be generated on !windows too).
>>> > If there are no chances for getting htod, maybe someone know decent
>>> > binding generators (scripting languages preferred)? The ones, which
>>> > I've
>>> > been using are too bad (i.e. stripping out const from various places).
>>>
>>> Just so you know, htod works on wine.
>> I know, but it's still not correct way to treat developers that are
>> working
>> with you on multiplatform project. That's why I'm searching for
>> multiplatform
>> solution. It's not like i am going to design by hack, at least starting
>> point
>> shouldn't force people to emulate other emulating system for updating
>> dependencies.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mariusz Gliwiński
>>
>