What's the problem in opensourcing htod?

[Andrej Mitrovic]

Well, Clang can build binaries on Windows. AFAIK the only problem is
exceptions on Windows.

On 12/22/10, Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> wrote:
> On 2010-12-21 22:58, Mariusz Gliwiński wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Why don't You make htod opensource? I don't think it has commercial
>> potential,
>> or I'm wrong? I'm asking, because it's a shame that people who wants
>> publish D
>> bindings have to make their own scripts for that (so bindings can be
>> generated
>> on !windows too).
>> If there are no chances for getting htod, maybe someone know decent
>> binding
>> generators (scripting languages preferred)? The ones, which I've been
>> using
>> are too bad (i.e. stripping out const from various places).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mariusz Gliwiński
>
> I'm working on a tool that creates bindings for Objective-C which of
> course have to work for plain C as well. It's built using the Clang
> libraries (it really helps having a complete frontend) and would work on
> any platforms supported by Clang. Even if Clang's support for Windows my
> not be complete I think it's enough for this tool, I mean it doesn't
> generate any binaries.
>
> --
> /Jacob Carlborg
>