PROPOSAL: Implicit conversions of integer literals to floating
spir
denis.spir at gmail.com
Thu Dec 30 17:41:59 PST 2010
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 21:13:05 +0100
Don <nospam at nospam.com> wrote:
> Yes, but OCaML isn't a C-family language, inheriting C's broken
> treatment of literals.
Just for information (I really mean information, not starting a new discussion): was it proposed to let down such legacy mess form C at the time when D1-->D2 was designed?
I know one of D's principles is that idioms that look like C code should have C's semantics (my words). But a major verson change...
Denis
-- -- -- -- -- -- --
vit esse estrany ☣
spir.wikidot.com
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list