Clay language

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 12/31/10 7:30 AM, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> And I stand by that claim. One aspect that seems to have been forgotten
>> is that types usually implement either op= in terms of op or vice versa.
>> That savings alone is large.
>>
> 	This could have been done with a couple of stdlib mixins
> "generateOpsFromOpAssign" and "generateOpAssignsFromOp".

The language definition would have stayed just as large.

Andrei