TDPL a bad idea?

[Bane]

> 
> Except that you could argue that the government is censoring it for the 
> people, thereby making it an outside force imposing control on the inside. 
> Merriam-Webster's online definition would tend to go with the whole "outside 
> force" idea: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/censor . Generally 
> speaking, censorship refers to one group cutting out or blocking material 
> from coming into contact with another group, but you might be able to argue 
> that it doesn't _have_ to be an outside force. Still, in any kind of normal 
> use, it would be.
> 
> - Jonathan M Davis

Legal/moral mumbo jumbo. There are group with resources to provide/deny something to other groups, and there are those without that power. Reason for first to do it at first place? Same why dog licks his ass - because he can.

So if admin of his mailing list can exercise his power to make it more useful to majority of readers on expense of few (troublesome) individuals, the better. Its not like anyone is going to gulag if placed on ban list, for fucks sake.