TDPL a bad idea?

[Nick Sabalausky]

"Andrei Alexandrescu" <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote in message 
news:hka0h4$rl9$1 at digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "retard" <re at tard.com.invalid> wrote in message 
>> news:hk9vgn$f4r$3 at digitalmars.com...
>>> Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:20:19 -0500, Bane wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Except that you could argue that the government is censoring it for 
>>>>> the
>>>>> people, thereby making it an outside force imposing control on the
>>>>> inside. Merriam-Webster's online definition would tend to go with the
>>>>> whole "outside force" idea:
>>>>> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/censor . Generally speaking,
>>>>> censorship refers to one group cutting out or blocking material from
>>>>> coming into contact with another group, but you might be able to argue
>>>>> that it doesn't _have_ to be an outside force. Still, in any kind of
>>>>> normal use, it would be.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Jonathan M Davis
>>>> Legal/moral mumbo jumbo. There are group with resources to provide/deny
>>>> something to other groups, and there are those without that power.
>>>> Reason for first to do it at first place? Same why dog licks his ass -
>>>> because he can.
>>>>
>>>> So if admin of his mailing list can exercise his power to make it more
>>>> useful to majority of readers on expense of few (troublesome)
>>>> individuals, the better. Its not like anyone is going to gulag if 
>>>> placed
>>>> on ban list, for fucks sake.
>>> At least in this newsgroup it's easy to get into peoples' killfile. Just
>>> disagree with your beloved deitys, Andrei and W.
>>
>> Meh, I've outright argued with both of them plenty of times.
>
> I confirm Nick is not in my killfile :o).
>
> Andrei

Considering some of our recent discussions, if I'm not in his killfile, it's 
probably blank ;)