Array operation for computing the dot product?
bearophile
bearophileHUGS at lycos.com
Thu Feb 4 01:46:50 PST 2010
Chad J:
> This reminds me of a discussion we had a year or more ago about offering
> abstract operators purely for the purpose of overloading. We can use
> things like (+), (*), (-), (&), and so on. It'd probably be fine to use
> one for dot product.
This looks acceptable as dot product:
x (*) y
but to me it doesn't look that much better than the simple:
x.dot(y)
Bye,
bearophile
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list