@safe status

[Walter Bright]

Michel Fortin wrote:
> So what's the plan? Should everything theoretically safe in Phobos be 
> @trusted to avoid complains about unnecessary checks in programs that 
> don't bother about safety? Or should we make things @safe and promote 
> them to @trusted (for performance) only after a careful review? I'm a 
> proponent of not making anything @trusted in Phobos until it has been 
> reviewed and approved by someone else than the author.

Every function in Phobos needs to be reviewed and tagged as safe, 
trusted or system as appropriate.