Coverity tool
retard
re at tard.com.invalid
Wed Feb 10 09:28:33 PST 2010
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:49:31 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
> D has moved a lot towards supplying by default a lot of what Coverity
> claims to do. By making such an expensive tool irrelevant for D, we can
> make D much more cost effective.
D doesn't provide non-nullable types and local refs can still escape the
scope easily. There are several kinds of bugs that cause null pointer
exceptions / segfaults. Now it took me 2 minutes to come up two examples:
class foo {
Object a;
this(Object a) { a = a; }
void bar() { a.toString(); }
Object[] baz() {
scope Object a = new Object;
return [ a ];
}
}
void main() {
auto a = new Object;
// auto b = new foo(a); // segfault
// b.baz()[0].toString(); // segfault
}
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list