foreach_reverse is better than ever

[Jonathan M Davis]

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

> Gone, that is. Walter agreed to remove it.
> 
> To achieve the functionality of
> 
> foreach_reverse (r) { ... }
> 
> use
> 
> foreach (retro(r)) { ... }
> 
> using retro in std.range.
> 
> 
> Andrei

I assume that this was to get rid of a keyword and reduce duplicate 
functionality.

Though I must say that I find retro to be a bit funny. I would have expected 
it to be reverse. It would be clearer, I think, but it's not like it's hard 
to find out what retro does and remember it.

- Jonathan M Davis