foreach_reverse is better than ever

[Lars T. Kyllingstad]

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Gone, that is. Walter agreed to remove it.
> 
> To achieve the functionality of
> 
> foreach_reverse (r) { ... }
> 
> use
> 
> foreach (retro(r)) { ... }
> 
> using retro in std.range.


Let me first say that I think it's great that one of D's ugliest 
keywords is going away. But does retro (or ranges in general) support 
iteration over both index and element?

   foreach_reverse(i, e; foo) { ... }

-Lars