foreach_reverse is better than ever
Mike James
foo at bar.com
Sun Feb 14 03:35:56 PST 2010
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
> Gone, that is. Walter agreed to remove it.
>
> To achieve the functionality of
>
> foreach_reverse (r) { ... }
>
> use
>
> foreach (retro(r)) { ... }
>
> using retro in std.range.
>
>
> Andrei
I think Reverse would have been a better title. Retro sounds like you might be using only 8088 assembler instructions in the output...
-=mike=-
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list