foreach_reverse is better than ever

[Nick Sabalausky]

"bearophile" <bearophileHUGS at lycos.com> wrote in message 
news:hl9ipc$26r1$1 at digitalmars.com...
> Andrei Alexandrescu:
>> I don't mind "reversed" but it's longer than "retro" and the convention
>> doesn't scale. For example, both active and passive forms of "split"
>> look the same.
>
> For me "retro" is acceptable. I don't love "iota" but I can accept it too. 
> Other names of Phobos2 can be improved.
>

I can be happy with either 'retro' or 'reverse'. My feeling on 'iota' used 
to be "It's not great, but I'm fine with it". But now I can't remember what 
the hell it does; no idea. The only things that come to mind are "Dyslexic 
Integer to ASCII conversion", and Futurama's "Tiny Iota? I could never be as 
good as him. He was a great Blurnsball player."