@strict

retard re at tard.com.invalid
Mon Feb 15 03:22:22 PST 2010


Mon, 15 Feb 2010 05:44:22 -0500, bearophile wrote:

> retard:
>> This kind of code is just unreadable. It's so bad it might be a joke as
>> well..
> 
> A better syntax can be invented, do you like this one?
> 
> @outer(in int y, in z, out k, inout w) int foo(int x) {
>     // ... code
> }

That syntax would probably be ok, but I haven't had time to ponder the 
semantics yet.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list