Whither Tango?

[retard]

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:38:02 +0000, Gareth Charnock wrote:

> But two compatible libraries? It means you can choose which one suits
> you best, and if a library you are using uses the other, well that's
> there choice. Perhaps you use mostly phobos but then use tango for XML
> (which I hear is very fast).

I doubt full compatibility can be achieved. E.g. using collection data 
structures from Tango and collection algorithms from Phobos. The 
compatibility is on core features and on binary level - you can mix in 
the both libraries, but it won't be enough to make code portable and 
reusable between the frameworks.